Reflections on relativity?....Rejections of relativity!

Welcome. This is a reasoned response to the relativity section at mathpages.com, a site promoted as the on-line and authoritative reference for all seeking explanations of mainstream relativity and its math support.

Mathpages is in fact our favorite comedy site on the Web, a truly modern fantasy, full of contradictions. Presented as mathematical support for relativity, it actually brings the errors into focus, a comedia errata. It is puzzling why it is cited to support any type of science, as the site is saturated with logical and mathematical errors, an unintended satire of modern thought. If grounded firmly in logic and mathematics, no one need be troubled by the intimidation of special relativity flak launched therein.

Does lack of response to the mathpages outrages signal descent into agnosticism and to nihilism beyond? God help us all.

All comments will be posted that are civil, relevant and coherent.

PLEASE READ THE INTRODUCTION BEFORE COMMENTING.

t/h to Peter and Amy for tech support.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Rules

A slice of Bacon, please....
Epistemology is a mouthful that means the rules for discovering truth.  Science has used a scientific method to find natural truth since Aristotle; we will use the improvement due to Francis Bacon, a standard which has unfortunately been abandoned by modern science. 
Bacon's scientific method:
Testing - "Mere argument is never sufficient; it gives no satisfaction or certainty, which can only be evinced by immediate inspection or intuition, which is what experience gives by verifying hypotheses and conclusions by direct experiment."
Four common causes of error are : authority, custom, the opinion of the unskilled many, and the concealment of real ignorance by a pretense of knowledge.

..... seasoned with Popper.
Karl Popper established criteria for scientific logic, which we will follow.
Falsifiability:  exclusion of theories outside the scope or possibility of testing in space or time or technology 
Consistency: no logical conflict among premises, hypothesis, conclusions and predictions
Sound reasoning: logically valid argument form and true premises
Testing: empirical applications of the conclusions and predictions

0 comments:

Post a Comment